Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
  • HomeCurrent Articles
  • Articles
  • EditorsWho we are
  • Conferences
  • SubmissionsHow to Submit an Article
  • ContactGet in Touch
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Wiley Download

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jems.12611

Alessandro S. Kadner-Graziano

The typical concern about vertical mergers is the foreclosure of downstream rivals. In a vertically related industry where downstream firms have a common supplier, margins can reveal whether upstream competition constrains that supplier. I develop a test (based on margins) to identify whether the supplier is constrained premerger and, consequently, cannot raise input prices postmerger. However, even without foreclosure in equilibrium, vertical mergers can harm consumers. Vertical mergers increase consumer prices and benefit all firms, including downstream rivals, when downstream (horizontal) competition weakens sufficiently. This theory of harm differs from typical theories, which pit the merged entity against downstream rivals.

Address

Harvard Business School
Soldiers Field Road
Boston, MA 02163

617-496-8392

Published with

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Editors
  • Conferences
  • Submissions
  • Contact
  • Early View
  • Current Issues
  • Archives 2002 – 2011
  • Archives 1992 – 2001
  • Special Issues
  • Aims and Scope

Follow us on

Twitter

Facebook

Google+

Bookmarks

  • Documentation
  • Plugins
  • Suggest Ideas
  • Support Forum
  • Themes
  • WordPress Blog
  • WordPress Planet
© Copyright - Journal of Economic Management and Strategy | Website Design: Wildwood SEO
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Free riding, democracy, and sacrifice in the workplace: Evidence from a real-effort... Forward contracting and the endogenous activity of heterogeneous firms
Scroll to top